How do you be top in a niche?

It would still be a substantial increase in the times, especially once one gets into multicellular

2 Likes

How do you think a Player-based miche would work? Would it take into account difficult settings?

1 Like

HOW would it work like though? Would it base it’s liking of one’s species by their playstyle, or by what they set up in the editor?

2 Likes

Probably a combination of Player’s playstyle, what the Player created in the Editor, and how well the Player species did (number deaths/lack of deaths, number of cell divisions, e.t.c.).

1 Like

I feel like that would take A LOT of coding to add, which’d be especially burdensome in this time of multicellular development

2 Likes

Maybe it could be added for Macroscopic first?

1 Like

Perhaps, but late on if at all since macroscopic is the critical stage for Thrive to get proper funding

1 Like

Absolutely, double the species is double the calculations.

I think I’ve said it before, but simple size is a poor representation for IRL niche division. Niches are primarily about what, where, when and how life survives while finding food.

It’s worth thinking again about why you think it is necessary for the player to be the top of a miche. It’s not necessary for avoiding extinction.

4 Likes

Is there any additional planned benefit to being the top of a niche besides being favored by Auto-Evo?

2 Likes

Maybe it could weaken the distraught brought by mass extinctions for you?

1 Like

Essentially no. Species get a share of the energy from a niche proportional to their score share, regardless of what miche they are top in. But non-player species that are not occupying miche and did not only just migrate somewhere get essentially deleted. That’s really all we need from it.

2 Likes

Speaking of miches, I presume they will feed into how one domesticates a species, right?

1 Like

So being able to live in Anthropogenic biomes would be one requirement for domestication, correct?

2 Likes

I suppose so, though in the past now gone animals like wolves were domesticated while living in relatively primordial environments when compared with what they are like now, didn’t they?

1 Like

That depends on how you define an Anthropogenic area. They did more or less move into the Social Centers the Homo sapiens lived in at the time. Given that some modern livestock essentially live on a grassland, those wolves may have adapted more that the modern livestock, coming inside of houses or equivalent.

1 Like

Tbf I am not sure you can even domesticate a species without interacting with it, so by definition you’d need the domesticated to, in some way, interact with anthopogenic environments

1 Like

Currently, starting endosymbiosis creates a new miche for them wherever you are. I imagine we could do something similar for domestication.

5 Likes

I presume such animals would get protection for their miche representing the interests of their domesticators, like how humans usually protect their own livestock?

4 Likes