It’s not really “necessary”, but it’s still the most moral thing to do
Theres a difference between executing a wounded soldier and a dying one
And morals should never be sacrificed, that always leads down the wrong path
What we see is mainly what we look for. —
I won’t delete that discobot post but if anyone else decides to do it too I’m deleting everything
Well that’s the issue: According to the genevan convention, executing a wounded soldiers is the exact same as a dying one
Don’t know if we should simplify such a specific case to “some war crimes are ok” because this line is begging to be abused by western imperialists and dictators all over the world.
I’m not saying we should put “sometimes war crimes are OK, choose for yourself” as an international law or something, just that what’s moral isn’t almost what’s legal and vice versa
Maybe I should have started a thread on this topic, this discussion is much larger than I thought.
You can tell I’m working overtime to make new ideas.
The shout box has been mine for 24 hours
Not any more 
Oof, my throne of shout.
DOWN WITH THE SHOUT KING!
I have been summoned by a disturbance.
lifes fun
ha ha ha, im da king
im the king
im the king