they could, but youโd need an extremely poinson resistant, artificial, adaptive immune system
if you used one of them to make all your antivenom though, eventually you could get one antivenom for every venom currently on earth(through stuff like broadly neutralizing antibodies(which are also useful against viruses)
though, you would also want to have a way of cloning them(like by taking a bone marrow and blood sample, and propagating the system from that)
ew. kill it with fire.
3 Likes
aah31415
(The maker of SitF, Radiostrocity, The Lifenote and TGBing; The Second Ascended...; And just maybe a security warning come alive...?)
8478
Interesting. So this antivenom could cover the entire spectrum of toxins we see on Earth?
aah31415
(The maker of SitF, Radiostrocity, The Lifenote and TGBing; The Second Ascended...; And just maybe a security warning come alive...?)
8480
If we for whatever reason artificially expanded the range of toxins to be covered, could the antivenom still keep up with that or would it eventually hit a barrier of just how much stuff it can cover as a single antivenom type?
NIH in the U.S. is now limiting grant applications to scientists due to fear of excess AI-generated grant applications; one person submitted 40 AI-generated grants applications, which was a major reason for this policy change.
Considering it literally caused a policy change which enacted suffering on other people who submit grants, one would hope the person learned his/her/their lesson and does not try it again.
1 Like
aah31415
(The maker of SitF, Radiostrocity, The Lifenote and TGBing; The Second Ascended...; And just maybe a security warning come alive...?)
8491
That assumes there arenโt others willing to go this wayโฆ
If there are, then that will make the grant funding system even more brokenโฆ
2 Likes
Deathwake
(i nuked zenzone and will never let him forget it)
8493
The same thing is happening in CVE/security bug reports. AI generated reports which no human has confirmed are actual bugs or pose actual security risks are flooding the system, I believe specifically in curl. The maintainers are mostly volunteers or otherwise overstretched and cannot spend their time testing every report if most of them are BS. Bug bounties rely on people only submitting things when the have an actual issue worth paying for the discovery of most of the time.
Itโs not impossible if you are a donator, which gives you permanent access to the category that shall not be named.
That point was actually brought in a video I recently posted from The Linux Experiment. Whatโs worse is that the people who do this think they are actually helping. Pathetic!