Let's boast about our IQ

[TheForumGameMaster (14M e/acc)]

Are you referring the "ghost"as me?

[aah31415 (The maker of SitF, Radiostrocity, The Lifenote and TGBing; The Second Ascended...; And just maybe a security warning come alive...?)]

No, it is reffering to this topic in this community itself, in it’s entirety.

[TheForumGameMaster (14M e/acc)]

[aah31415 (The maker of SitF, Radiostrocity, The Lifenote and TGBing; The Second Ascended...; And just maybe a security warning come alive...?)]

Is this an online IQ test or real-life one?

[TheForumGameMaster (14M e/acc)]

Online, but I think it generally supports my point that my matrix reasoning subscore is improving. Just a year to half a year ago, I typically scored around 130-143 on most online IQ tests revolving entirely around matrix reasoning.

[fralegend015 (Shroudmaster)]

So what you are saying is that you are getting better at solving IQ tests.

[StrategyGameR (Your friendly neighborhood menace to society.)]

What website is that on I would like to know mine (I’m in the gifted program at my school(I use lots of parentheses…(I guess there’s no limit(I could just keep rambling(string [ ] args))))

[Deathwake (i nuked zenzone and will never let him forget it)]

I least favorite things about parentheses memes is how often people like Randall Monroe use the term paren.

[StrategyGameR (Your friendly neighborhood menace to society.)]

There like DLCs on the original thought (wait Randall Monroe, I read all his books and most of xkcd)

[50gens]

Say something that only a 140+ iq person can say

---

@fralegend015

If sounding like an intelligent person means talking with specific patterns then anyone can do so,

Can you say something not even chatgpt can say?

Alternate challenge: Prove that if such a thing could exist, then everyone could say it, therefore it wouldn’t exist. I don’t mean it can be said after everyone hears it, I mean prove that it can’t be said in the first place.

I am expecting that intelligent people can solve every challenge. Either the challenge itself or proving the challange can’t be solved.

[Nigel]

no

[50gens]

That wasn’t a 140+ iq answer. Text too short to determine smartness. Not even in context.

[Nigel]

@50gens

Text too short to determine smartness.

well then the engine needs an upgrade
(this is just assuming determine in this case is used as “establish” or “ascertain”)

on a side note this reminded me of those ai text detectors lol

[C009 (Least favourite developer)]

“I have 140+ IQ” would go?

[Nigel]

@50gens

Don’t forget that the challange is to prove it with words alone. Don’t say “I have 140+ IQ” and attach your text result or your footage of solving it. Prove logicly that you can say a sentence and make it true no matter its content. It shouldn’t reference anything in the external world that isn’t created with words. Alternatively, make a sentence that proves iq on its own. Stating your iq isn’t such a sentence.

someone with 140+ iq (probably) wouldn’t engage in this restrictive challenge to begin with

[50gens]

A being of great intelligence would have no difficulty when engaging with mortals. In fact, there may be many reasons and opportunities for such an interaction.

ant cult meme

There is no fermi paradox that states that you must seclude yourself from other people in order to get smarter. It is the other way around.

[aah31415 (The maker of SitF, Radiostrocity, The Lifenote and TGBing; The Second Ascended...; And just maybe a security warning come alive...?)]

@50gens

being of great intelligence would have no difficulty when engaging with mortals.

Are you trying to say that you’re some sort of a god compared to people with average IQ?

[Nigel]

someone with actual intellect wouldn’t seek approval from some random internet user, they would use their time more wisely.

[Nigel]

@50gens

Challenges are what a mind craves the most. The reaction they get may be an interesting observation for them than just solving it and not saying anything.

well, if that is true, then i believe people would go after challenges that are fair, rather than ones that are determined subjectively by someone who has stated to have lower iq than them to begin with. how are you supposed to judge someone else’s intellect if you yourself cannot grasp it? this isnt meant to bash anyone’s intellect btw, everyone is unique and has their own things they are more capable of than others, and by extension some things they are less capable of.

[50gens]

If I cannot grasp it, then it is high. A simple methodology.