White spots are a bit reminescent of nuclei
Title: I Donโt Care If This Video Gets Banned, But Stop Saving Animals Id**ts
Am I the only one who thinks this is a mess (ok theyโre not going to launch a tungsten rod into space butโฆ)
they drop a 400 pound steel weight (which swings from what they think itโs from light wind rather rather than the helicopter moving)from 50 meters onto a sandcastle which doesnโt entirely break because sand isnโt as strong as steel reinforced concrete and moves instead of breaking the whole structure and then conclude that this is impossible while also mentioning the real problem which is that they would be hard to precisely aim and do not as much damage as explosives sometimes but say that you need 300 orbiting the earth to have one near the target, also why canโt you put them in a semi orbit where the go to space and come back down far away nuke style.
That channel has a lot of other good videos, they make good skits.
This is another one of my favorite from them:
Title: Bodycam Footage Reveals the Arrest of Chris Chan
Channel: EWU Bodycam
Interesting that we can still see the thumbnail even when the video is deleted
I was going to post bad apple in English here but the video disabled playing on other websites, oh well look up โbad apple in Englishโ if you want to realize itโs supposed to be sad not just random apples morphing into people.
Yeh ik itโs sad itโs just also 1 bit color so it can be played on everything from Minecraft to the desmos graphing calculator
Can you play Bad Apple on DOOM?
I wonder why isnโt there any fish species that is shaped like this stick. They could have swam up a river without spending any energy.
During the cambrian explosion, every species evolved exoskeleton. Even the jellyfish had spikes to fend off predators.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbelgiumS0zPbyc)
โWe often view niches as individual pieces which exist on a board puzzle. But in reality, they arenโt so discrete.โ
When a species evolves to fill a new niche, it can only conquer a niche that was similar to the previous one it filled. And animal groups tend to get specialized to niche groups over time. In the future, we probably wonโt see marine reptiles again or a large marine bird. Any marine mammal that goes extinct would be replaced by another marine mammal. Which is to say, evolution tends to get more boring over time and the players would want to progress to awakening stage.
Sorry, but that video of the stick moving upstream is most likely fake. But now I have seen the first physics forum post that cites YouTube shorts as a source lol.
They donโt say in the comments that it is fake.
darriusking2438 commented that โIt doesnโt defy physics, it fully embraces it.โ So I thought it was a well known phenomena. There wasnโt any speculation into the details for how it works, so I should have gotten suspicious. About 50% of the comments I make get shadowbanned, and 90% of the long ones. So I shouldโve never thought the comments were a representetive sample. Youtube is incentivised to censor any hype killer that would prevent the video from being shared and watched even more. And also any time you spend engaging on the comments is a time youโre not watching videos and not seeing ads. The more brainless a comment you make, the more it is likely to be placed above other comments. Probably. In the physics stack exchange, the user ganv commented โif the stick is moving with the fluid, there is no relative motion of the stick to the fluid and therefore no way for it to extract energy from the flow and begin to move through the fluidโ which makes total sense. The stick doesnโt have any information about how fast the water is moving on the ground. Or if the river is flowing at all. So since it would be stationary in a stationary water, it should also be stationary when the water is moving. With respect to water. It wouldnโt work in any galileian world.
Honestly, Iโd prefer if intel became the AMD (of GPUs) of CPUs, really underpriced, owning weird markets (AMDs APUs win even in game consoles just cause Nvidiaโs CPUs are laughable), and doing nice things like dropping the high end or sticking with AM4 for ages (Iโm rocking an outdated am4 PC, itโs quite convenient knowing Iโll have support for a bit, I probably wonโt upgrade til AM6), and failing on AI. Itโs obviously unlikely, but hell Qualcomm making x86 cpus would be wild, and that might lead to, for example, nvidia getting an x86 license and market fragmentation, or a cheap af selloff of battlemage gpus or whichever. Either way itโd be very interesting, even if my nonsense is silly speculation.