On a semi-related note, should our goal with this eusocialization of humanity also be to reduce our own individuality, and if so, by how much?
I don’t really think this is necessarily a goal, as much as it is just a development that could happen which might make our species, or a subset of it, more likely to carry on/speciate. I’m not advocating that humans being a eusocial superorganism would necessarily be morally good, just that it may be more successful over long time scales/massive punctured equilibrium events. I do think becoming eusocial would entail giving up individuality to a pretty great extent.
I also kinda have a feeling human parthenogenesis would first be patented by the rich for use by the rich only for cloning themselves
… what do you mean “blue eye?”
It is a term I use in reference to Hhyyrylainen
Ahh right, though I guess metal eye would be a better description.
That’s why I also sometimes referred to him as the big blue robotic eye (BBRE)