True endosymbiosis

Future Game Microbe Stage
41

So the conditions of endosymbiosis will be:
1-for a procariote endosymbiosis
A-the host should:
-first, be ready to mitosis(replicating itself,have access to the editor if he wants)
-second, have topped off the phosphore and amoniac reservoirs
-Third: engulfed a target once
Note: the order is necessary
B-Target:
-not be toxic
-could be replicated by the host reservoir of phosphore and amoniac
2-for a eucariote endosymbiosis
A- the host must:
first, be ready to mitosis(replicating itself,have access to the editor if he wants)
-second, have topped of the phosphore and amoniac reservoi.r
-Third: engulfed once a target who is ready duplicate itself or has just replicated itself
-fourth: for 2 or more generation the host should gother extra phosphore and amoniac to replicate itself.
Note: the order is necessary

B-Target:
-should not be toxic
-is a decendent of a speciy that have done a procariote endosymbiosis

Global note:this process could still be made in multicellular phase

1 Like
42

Now the only thing left is whenever this would pay off if somebody went thru the effort of adding this into Thrive.

1 Like
43

We are only discussion possibilities, moreover I think this should be voted for to become an official feature

1 Like
44

Pretty sure Hhyyrylainen has a deciding say as to what suggestions are good enough to be included in the game…

1 Like
45

He is online should we we call him?

1 Like
46

They will come here when they choose. No need to call them.

1 Like
47

Endosymbiosis (full) is on the Debatable Features list. If its scientifically accurate, balanced, and meets Thrives coding grammar rules (spacing, capitalization, description placement, etc.), I am sure they would love to have it, but they don’t feel it’s worth putting the time in to do it themselves right now.

2 Likes
48

At the present situation, the chances of it being added are close to 0.

1 Like
49

I want model we have conceived above to be checked and discussed for scientific accuracy, (at least from my logical and current understanding of evolution and endosymbiosis it should be fine) from game play it looks way better than the current endosymbiosis at least it looks more challenging

1 Like
50

But the question remains if it will be seen as a good enough quality increase for the amount of effort needed to code it into the game.

1 Like
51

From my point of view it’s good and this is enough for now since This will give me even more incentive to learn game engines in the future

1 Like
52

We’ll see if by the time you gain enough coding experience endosymbiosis upgrade/improvement topic will still be relevant…

1 Like
53

Unless someone do it it will be there for someone to do it, if it’s not there then it must have already been done which is even better :laughing:

1 Like
54

Or it’s been considered unnecesarry and so removed from the list of debatable features…

1 Like
55

Well, that’s possible, totally possible however the idea will always stay in my mind so it will be okay and more over this topic will be archived I think as a reference, no?

1 Like
56

It should stay up, atleast as long as this forum exists…

2 Likes
57

what i meant is that a lot of cells mite have spare compondes

1 Like
58

what do you mean by “Cell mite”?

59

might have spare compounds?

1 Like
60

Could be. I guess here it could be “spare compunds” from organelles which are no longer useful when an endosymbiont turns into an organelle.

1 Like