Elephants, for example, appear to be unable to use fire from my research, despite being smart enough to understand mirrors and form simple religions
What realism? Fire is a major component of civilization, if you donāt have the tech to advance, you donāt have the tech to advance
If I donāt have a knowledge of aerodynamics, then I cant build machines to fly
If I donāt know rocket science, then I cant build rockets to get to space
Itās how it works now, if your cell isnāt adapted to the current environment you go extinct. Thatās how evolution works
Adapt, or die
Religion? What evidence do you have of elephants having a religion???
And while elephants and other animals show signs of intelligence, itās not on the level of a human, could they evolve to form more complicated brains and a higher intelligence? Maybe, but they are no where near a human intelligence wise.
Intelligence is just just another factor of what technology they can use, some animals are intelligent enough to (somewhat) use tools, but they arnt doing anything on the complexity a human can accomplish
Itās a major component of our civilization. There are many plausible-seeming ways of advancing without it. For example, it doesnāt seem impossible to simply not have tech that needs fire until youāre approaching industrial stage
Either way, intelligence and fire are barely correlated any more than kidneys and hair, and thereās no good evidence Iāve seen of a connection
Can you give some examples?
Please tell me you are joking
Iām done, this has gone in a circle
Yeah Iāve stopped taking him seriously now
@BurgeonBlas if you want to be taken seriously, then instead of placing the burden of disproving your outlandish claims on other people, you should take it upon yourself to prove them.
I just gave one: Simply ommiting fiery tools. You can still make ploughs, mechanisms, and rather dangerous weapons without any fire required
Whatās the joke? There are fire-using animals with rather meagre-seeming minds (firehawks, perhaps chimps), and many intelligent species with no evidence of fire (elephants). That seems a lot like thereās no correlation
Iāve shown that fire and intelligence are poorly linked at best, Iāve explained why fire might be easy for a player to ignore, and Iāve shown where this presents a problem. What other claims are there that I have failed to evidence?
also, um, what the hell do you want?? im still confused about that, explain it to me like im five, cause all i see is you complaining about softlocks that maybe exist, like, whats the end goal?
Iām asking if anyone can present a way to make fire a requirement without softlocking or otherwise screwing over players who do not have a complete understanding of fire and who are likely to miss out on fire use
Yes but what about chemical processes that require fire?
Light sources?
The use of metals?
Just saying āthey can use stone toolsā proves nothing, they are just literally stuck in the stone age, but without fire
Examples of this? Not just ātrust me broā
You just contradicted yourself
Edit: my apologies I misread what you said about the elephants using fire, with them not being able to, but even then itās as I said, they are just not on a higher intelligence level to do so
Way more things come from fire than you think. For example, glass blowing has come from fire usage. Without it we would know basically no astronomy.Fire is definitely needed before the industrial stage.
Not to mention the use of pottery
They donāt need chemistry from day one, suns exist, and a lot of things that need metal have alternatives when you really need them
So what about firehawks? Are they smarter than elephants?
Why do we need astronomy before we have industry? Thatās not the best argument
Also, if not requiring fire wonāt work, whatās the alternative for Thrive? Do you think softlocking half of all players in the middle of the game is an acceptable sacrifice to avoid an industrial society not knowing astronomy?
You just restated what you said, what evidence do you have for this? From a video of them using it? A research paper? I said I donāt want just a ātrust me broā
Stone is inferior to metal, and if they ever hope to advance at all, metal is needed, you cant build a steam engine out of wood or stone
Simple, make it so a player can get fire in any moment they want if the requirements are fulfilled. I have no idea why you havent come up with such an obvious solution.
Have you tried using google? Itās not hard to find out about animals using and not using fire
Wood exists, and people have made some crazy stuff with it. Oftentimes they used wood even when they had access to metal (for example, windmills)
Because it is not realistic
Holy belgium thats a lot
Well this is the FOURTH TIME now
Sorry burgeon but you were warned before
This thread is getting locked
Ok fine so I googled animals using fire and all I can find about it as that Firehawks can pick up sticks on fire and make dry grass catch on fire to draw out pray, and chimps using it to to cook food, but neither can create their own fire
Wood is inferior to metal in a lot of ways, you ever seen a wood engine? A wood skyscraper? A wood rocket? Metal is a requirement for more advanced things