what im saying is the whole panspermia thing is horrendously unlikely. Life would have to be on an ateroid, survive for millions if not billions of years, and then miraculously make its way into the solar system, or even into another planets orbit.
With the VAST expanse of the universe, tell me that life making its way here is likely.
Then why isn’t life on every single planet? We haven’t detected it on Mars even tho we sent there so many missions, and it’s a lot more life-friendly than asteroids.
The solar system wasnt even anywhere NEAR existant in the time the universe was “filled with life”, according to the video itself.
Even if there were life on asteroids, it woulda died out by now most likely
so…youre saying only the ones that made it to earth in your scenario were able to exit their hybernation, even though they, in your scenario, evolved to HAVE such hibernation?
Other thing to consider:
DNA has a natural half-life, and after a few million years it would be unusable to any organism.
So how would asteroids travelling for millions of years deliver healthy microbes?
Edit:
" 521 years
A study of DNA extracted from the leg bones of extinct moa birds in New Zealand found that the half-life of DNA is 521 years. So every 1,000 years, 75 per cent of the genetic information is lost. After 6.8 million years, every single base pair is gone." - Google