Yeah, that’s basically the main point, by simulating how light really works you can get really realistic results very easily. Instead in traditional rendering you need to use all kinds of fancy tricks to approximate how light really works, which is much harder to program but requires much less computing power.
4 Likes
help me i can’t login on devcenter to test multiplayer
thats kind of off topic so why don’t you say it in the questions thread and not here
also welcome because you are new
How are you trying to log in (which login method)?
thats kind of off topic so why don’t you say it in the questions thread and not here
also welcome because you are new
Welcome to the Community Forums, @JrStivers20 and @Johanliebert!
2 Likes
With current development speed, how do you devs expect to finish the 0.6.x series to be completed?
It might be a doable goal this year. If not this year, I’m pretty sure we’ll get them done at the latest during next year.
3 Likes
What do you think about using open ai to speed up the workflow?
Sure, here’s an example of how you could extract the repeated code into a separate method:
open ai made this when i asked it to optimize Program.cs
private static void HandleCommonOptions(OptionsBase options)
{
CommandLineHelpers.HandleDefaultOptions(options);
ColourConsole.WriteDebugLine($"Running {options.GetType().Name} tool");
}
You can call this method in each method before the actual implementation, like this:
private static int RunChecks(CheckOptions options)
{
HandleCommonOptions(options);
// rest of the implementation
}
Here’s an example of how you could extract the common code in the mapResult method into a separate method:
private static int RunTask(Func<OptionsBase, Task<bool>> task, OptionsBase options)
{
HandleCommonOptions(options);
var tokenSource = ConsoleHelpers.CreateSimpleConsoleCancellationSource();
return task(options).Result ? 0 : 1;
}
You can call this method in the mapResult method like this:
.MapResult(
(CheckOptions options) => RunTask(RunChecks, options),
(TestOptions options) => RunTask(RunTests, options),
(ChangesOptions options) => RunTask(RunChangesFinding, options),
(LocalizationOptions options) => RunTask(RunLocalization, options),
(CleanupOptions options) => RunTask(RunCleanup, options),
(PackageOptions options) => RunTask(RunPackage, options),
(UploadOptions options) => RunTask(RunUpload, options),
(ContainerOptions options) => RunTask(RunContainer, options),
(SteamOptions options) => RunTask(SetSteamOptions, options),
(GodotTemplateOptions options) => RunTask(RunTemplateInstall, options),
(TranslationProgressOptions options) => RunTask(RunTranslationProgress, options),
(CreditsOptions options) => RunTask(RunCreditsUpdate, options),
CommandLineHelpers.PrintCommandLineErrors);
Please note that this is a sample implementation and you may need to adjust the code to suit your specific needs.
1 Like
That’s the main gripe, really. How would it be actually used? At least something like Github Co-Pilot is integrated to IDEs. Copy-pasting things to different places to have the AI do a trivial code manipulation, doesn’t seem like a productivity improvement to me. Of course anyone writing code is free to use tools that help them, but I just don’t see how in its current form the AI would actually help, because you need to anyway check over the code to make sure the AI didn’t do a dumb mistake and the AI is very unlikely to be aware of the entire Thrive source code so it can only work on small snippets, which is not the hardest part of software development (the hardest part is working on a huge codebase and fitting new code in there or making changes).
3 Likes
Since 0.6.x will have an organelle upgrade update(s) what upgrades you have planned for it?
Also another question will there be a way in macroscopic editor to know the aero(water?)dynamics and buoyancy of players creature?
Firstly, please do not double post, edit your previous post instead. Secondly, there’s some ideas floating around. For 0.6.1 in addition to the current organelle upgrades in the game, cilia will have one upgrade option.
2 Likes
Why hasn’t anyone told me that there was progress on the multicell stage? Or was it removed? Was the movement from the macroscopic stage removed?
Source:
What do you think the GUI of macroscopic stage will look like?
Will the Auto-Evo also be able to utilize organelle upgrades?
It was not removed, macroscopic stage prototype still has movement (unless some bug broke it, but removing it was definitely not intentional).
Yes, but as with most auto-evo things there just haven’t been anyone willing to program the feature:
Issue open since January 2022.
4 Likes
It’s intresting that every update there is atleast a small update on the prototype,
I’m pretty sure there’s been multiple updates where nothing (except keeping up with changes to the rest of the game) have been done for the prototypes. For example I’m pretty sure 0.6.0 did not have any work on the prototype other than making sure it still works with changes to the rest of the game. 0.6.1 is getting a new joke movement mode for 3D, but that’ll probably be it.
What kind of movement will it be?
Sorry for annoying you.
Normal third person (relative to camera) or relative to world coordinates, which is a joke mode I put in because I added a screen relative microbe movement mode, which is something people have been (sometimes rudely) asking for years.
3 Likes
Sorry if I’m asking this a bit too early, but will the macroscopic multicellular stage have a diffrent GUI then microbe stage?