They help in reducing the population of mosquitos tho.
1 Like
another reason why you shouldn’t eat them
1 Like
So mosquitos are good or what?
1 Like
you shouldnt eat them because if they’re in your stomach they wont reduce the mosquito population
1 Like
Why would you eat a spider anyways
you dont
thats why you check your ration for any signs of them
1 Like
What is the opposite of a spider?
What did they tell you?
i am being hunted for my crimes against SCP-049 (turning him into a catboy)
also btw your computer isn’t dying i corrupted the image myself
1 Like
Why can’t you contain the doctor? Aren’t you the director?
I am just now remembering i never figured out exactly how 049’s touch of death works, and i wish to know but am not willing to test whether or not it spreads through neural pathways or through cells, as if it spreads through neural pathways, it can spread through the links between disconnected parts of an 8610-2 instance.
But i do have my soul crystallized already…
We got any dead 3008 employees yet? I know the soul crystals made by 8610 Instances (designated 8610-<3) can’t replace the consciousness of a body(test done on a d-class who quite frankly should’ve been left on death row), or possess it without permission from the soul living inside it, that i have to try to possess something through it, and i already know i can possess things with no consciousness, like worms, jellyfish, and sea sponges, with little effort, but I want to see if i can possess something dead with no brain, and i wanna see how they look on the inside while moving, and if they even can move after dying.
Oh, right, figuring out how his touch of death works.
Does it work on worms?
1 Like
I’m fairly sure it’s supposed to work on anything alive
K, do we know if it destroys the soul or just kills the cells?
1 Like
If it touches a human it turns them into a SCP-049-B, so perhaps it only kills the souls?
Ok, so that’s the exact opposite of convenient, cause no matter how many pieces a soul crystal is split into, it only contains one soul, so, that means I’m catifying that d-class to test that.
1 Like
What if a soul crystal contains more than one soul?
If a body has multiple souls, it forms as many soul crystals as there are souls in it, so the only ways to get a soul crystal to contain multiple would be to force a soul into an occupied soul crystal(likely by putting one in someone’s body and then terminating them), or to fuse two soul crystals, which, you’d need either a big gem socket, a lot of precision, or a lot of very tiny peices of the whole crystals to do.
That said, you can mold soul crystals with plastic gem sockets, and then take them out, as they only make metals indestructible, and metalloids drastically more durable, so if you want to fuse very tiny parts of multiple soul crystals to be used as a communication hub, and still be able to socket it later, use a non-metallic gem socket as a crucible.
1 Like
There is no such thing as an ethical way of consuming human flesh.
But before I explain why there is no ethical way consuming human flesh I will explain where this argument comes from. It is because of a phenomenon that a wise person I know of calls “False progressism” or “Tumblr extremism” (the latter name I find particularly fitting you), this phenomenon is derived from the libertarian principle, which in a nutshell states that a person should be free to do anything they want as long as it doesn’t limit another person’s freedom; some people (especially on the internet) use an extreme interpretation of the libertarian principle, with which they try to justify things such as necrophilia, incest, cannibalism and other unethical and generally abhorent practices with phrases such as “between consenting adults this should be allowed”. Now that I have explained where this argument comes from, I will proceed to explain why it is wrong.
First, eating human flesh is very unsanitary, it is filled with diseases that a person could catch very easily and even carry prions, which are impossible to cure, get rid off or even accurately test; plus the cannibalized person will have a severe and probably permanent injury. You will probably think that this does not mean it is unethical, but I must remember you that we should also protect people from making choices that are guaranteed or very likely to harm them, this is why self-harm and suicide are immoral and why it is mandated by law to wear a seat belt.
Cannibalism also violates kantian ethics, which state that a human should never be treated as a means to an end, but cannibalism inherently turns a human into a means to either nutrition or pleasure. Plus, by consuming someone’s flesh you are favoring an objectifiying vision of them, with which you see them as a form of nutrition, thing which damages your emotional attachement to them.
The argument also bases itself on a non sequitur: only because two people want to do something doesn’t make it ethical, a person might consent to being killed and another to kill them, but that doesn’t make the act ethical and the same is true for slavery. In addition, the premise “Between consenting adults this should be allowed” or variations of the like, betray that the libertarian principle alone isn’t enough: other than freedom, consent and adulthood are required, and if we recognize that more than the libertarian principle is required then why not add more conditions?
Finally, this argument is based on a premise that is wrong: that the people consenting are sound of mind, because if they weren’t then the consent would not be valid, but if they want to be cannibalized then by definition they aren’t sound of mind and therefore their consent is invalid. And that is also the reason for which things like synthetic human meat would be unethical too, because you would be enabling a mental illness.
1 Like
i heard cannibalism is legal in edge cases i think like you’re stranded on an island and the only food source is a dead body or smth
1 Like